Our Constitution needs to be amended to reflect the realities of the day. Instead of freedom of speech it should read "freedom of propaganda." Here is a fresh example which I heard just a few minutes ago on the Diane Rehm show on NPR. The topic is the "war on terror." A caller asked a question as to why questions raised by Architects and Engineers for Truth on 9/11 aren't being addressed by the officials in a persuasive scientific manner which may put worries of some kind of a government conspiracy at bay.
Two "experts" answered. One said that it is not worth his time to discuss some far-fetched conspiracy theories which try to cast doubt on the FACT that Al-Qaeda had attacked us. The other one reiterated that even though the caller does SOUND like an intelligent person, his question clearly does not deserve to be answered. Both sounded annoyed (surely you would sound annoyed when the only answer you can give is "this can't be so, because it can never be so" and you have to appear such a complete idiot on the air).
The moderator was only too happy to let them get away with the "answers" which were exactly the subject of the question: why are the only answers we are getting in return to scientific EVIDENCE that the twin towers could not have collapsed the way they did from an impact to the top floors of the type - of the type "uh-h-h, go away, you are stupid and unpatriotic." They have nothing to say, but a lot to preach.
A little reminder: please check out INFORMATION on Operation Northwoods which is a documented (and available for public perusal) PLAN by the CIA to commit acts of terror against Americans in order to use it as a pretext to start a war with Cuba pretending that terrorism was the work of the Cuban government.
These government "experts" don't understand that by trying to shun intelligent questions they turn suspicion of their government's wrongdoing into a conviction. Keep preaching, reverend propagandists!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment